I have a global shared library on Jenkins implicitly loaded on all pipelines, then my Jenkinsfile
is like that:
new com.company.Pipeline()()
And then the shared library has on directory src/com/company
some files, below the Pipeline.groovy
class:
package com.company
import static Utils.*
def call() {
// some stuff here...
}
The problem is, this way I have to static declare all methods, thus I lose the context and cannot access jenkins' methods easly without the Pipeline
class' instance. As you can see here they passing this
to the method mvn
.
Thinking about avoid it I was wondering about dynamically add all methods as closures by calling Utils.install this
instead of using import static Utils.*
, then my Utils.groovy
is something like that:
package com.company
private Utils() {}
static def install(def instance) {
def utils = new Utils()
// Some extra check needed here I know, but it is not the problem now
for (def method in (utils.metaClass.methods*.name as Set) - (instance.metaClass.methods*.name as Set)) {
def closure = utils.&"$method"
closure.delegate = instance
instance.metaClass."$method" = closure
}
}
def someMethod() {
// here I want to use sh(), tool(), and other stuff freely.
}
But it raises an GStringImpl
cannot be cast to String
error, I believe .&
do not work with variables, how can I convert a method into closure? I have the MetaMethod
interface mostly being a CachedMethod
instance, if it were possible to turn it a ClosureMetaMethod
instance maybe the problem can be solved, but whenever I search for method to closure conversion for groovy I just found the .&
solution!
If I use instance.metaClass.someMethod = utils.&someMethod
it do work, but I want it to be dinamic as I add new methods without needing to worry about sharing it.
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire